You are here: Home » ... » ... » ... » ... » ... » Abstracts - Volume 131(2) - July 2001 » Volume 131(2), pp. 93-109

Volume 131(2), pp. 93-109

Send this page to somebody Print this page
 
Belgian Journal of Zoology - Volume 131(2), pp. 93-109

Rui Diogo (email for reprint), Claudia Oliveira and Michel Chardon

Laboratory of Functional and Evolutionary Morphology, University of Liège
Institut de Chimie, Bat. B6, B-4000 Sart-Tilman (Liège), Belgium

On the homologies of the skeletal components of catfish (Teleostei: Siluriformes) suspensorium

Abstract:

There has been much controversy concerning the identity of the components of the suspensorium in Siluriformes (catfishes). This confusion has implications not only for comparative morphology, but also for phylogenetic studies. The identity of the suspensorium components in catfish is reviewed here on the basis of: 1) dissections of numerous catfishes, including members of the most primitive group (Diplomystidae), and morphological descriptions in the literature; 2) developmental and paleontological data available; 3) functional morphology; and 4) comparisons with other member of the Ostariophysi, as well as with other teleosts. Our observations and comparisons indicate that catfish suspensorium consists of: 1) a hyomandibula+metapterygoid compound, which corresponds to the hyomandibula plus metapterygoid of other teleosts; 2) a symplectic+quadrate compound, which corresponds to the symplectic+quadrate of other teleosts; 3) an ectopterygoid+ectopterygoid compound, which corresponds to the entopterygoid plus ectopterygoid of other teleost. The small bones present in several catfishes between the anterior portions of the pars quadrata, the palatine, and the ethmoideal region are considered to be sesamoid ossifications.

Key words:

catfish, comparative anatomy, cranium, evolution, ethmoideal region, homologies, morphology, Ostariophysi, suspensorium, Siluriformes, suspensorium.

 
Last modified : September 25, 2006